This was on the BBC website today for World Philosophy Day.
SHOULD WE KILL HEALTHY PEOPLE FOR THEIR ORGANS?
Suppose Bill is a healthy man without family or loved ones. Would it be ok painlessly to kill him if his organs would save five people, one of whom needs a heart, another a kidney, and so on? If not, why not?
Consider another case: you and six others are kidnapped, and the kidnapper somehow persuades you that if you shoot dead one of the other hostages, he will set the remaining five free, whereas if you do not, he will shoot all six. (Either way, he'll release you.)
If in this case you should kill one to save five, why not in the previous, organs case? If in this case too you have qualms, consider yet another: you're in the cab of a runaway tram and see five people tied to the track ahead. You have the option of sending the tram on to the track forking off to the left, on which only one person is tied. Surely you should send the tram left, killing one to save five.
But then why not kill Bill?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Almost like spring
It was still chilly this morning but Juno and I were in the woods by 7 and enjoying the light at last, the days stretching at either end not...
-
With Glen and Harri back on Tuesday, Viv kindly offered to have Rag for the final two days of the trip which meant a short journey over to W...
-
With Joy having moved into the care home some months ago, I decided to rejoin the village hall committee in the New Year, so I could get inv...
-
Out early with Juno at 6.30 in sub-zero temperatures so I could drive Alison to work and then take Maria to dance. Alison needed the car for...
No comments:
Post a Comment